<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments for Glasgow Guardian</title> <atom:link href="http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk</link> <description>Glasgow Guardian</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:44:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>Comment on Glasgow University Sport crowned regional champions by Exclusive interview with Chris Millar, GUSA president-elect &#171; We Are Free Agents</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/sport/glasgow-university-sport-crowned-regional-champions/#comment-4707</link> <dc:creator>Exclusive interview with Chris Millar, GUSA president-elect &#171; We Are Free Agents</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:44:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=5525#comment-4707</guid> <description>[...] confident that Glasgow uni can retain the title they won in 2011: “We’re putting up some brave talk I’m reading in the press releases so yeah I’d love to [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] confident that Glasgow uni can retain the title they won in 2011: “We’re putting up some brave talk I’m reading in the press releases so yeah I’d love to [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on SRC 2012 interviews VPLD: Megan Cowie by SRC Spring Elections 2012 &#124; Glasgow Guardian</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/news/src-2012-megan-cowie/#comment-4706</link> <dc:creator>SRC Spring Elections 2012 &#124; Glasgow Guardian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 19:09:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=7723#comment-4706</guid> <description>[...] for it?PresidentChizzy Chisholm Lucky Dhillon James Harrison Jani HelleVP Learning &amp; DevelopmentMegan Cowie Razvan Balaban Dave WalkerVP Student SupportEllie Munro Jess McGrellis James OrrVP Media &amp; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for it?PresidentChizzy Chisholm Lucky Dhillon James Harrison Jani HelleVP Learning &amp; DevelopmentMegan Cowie Razvan Balaban Dave WalkerVP Student SupportEllie Munro Jess McGrellis James OrrVP Media &amp; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on SRC 2012 interviews VPLD: Dave Walker by SRC Spring Elections 2012 &#124; Glasgow Guardian</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/news/src-2012-dave-walker/#comment-4705</link> <dc:creator>SRC Spring Elections 2012 &#124; Glasgow Guardian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=7726#comment-4705</guid> <description>[...] Lucky Dhillon James Harrison Jani HelleVP Learning &amp; DevelopmentMegan Cowie Razvan Balaban Dave WalkerVP Student SupportEllie Munro Jess McGrellis James OrrVP Media &amp; CommunicationsDouglas Aithie [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lucky Dhillon James Harrison Jani HelleVP Learning &amp; DevelopmentMegan Cowie Razvan Balaban Dave WalkerVP Student SupportEllie Munro Jess McGrellis James OrrVP Media &amp; CommunicationsDouglas Aithie [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on SRC 2012 interviews President: Jani Helle by SRC Spring Elections 2012 &#124; Glasgow Guardian</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/news/src-2012-jani-helle/#comment-4704</link> <dc:creator>SRC Spring Elections 2012 &#124; Glasgow Guardian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 21:08:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=7724#comment-4704</guid> <description>[...] stream, how are they going to pay for it?PresidentChizzy Chisholm Lucky Dhillon James Harrison Jani HelleVP Learning &amp; DevelopmentMegan Cowie Razvan Balaban Dave WalkerVP Student SupportEllie Munro [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stream, how are they going to pay for it?PresidentChizzy Chisholm Lucky Dhillon James Harrison Jani HelleVP Learning &amp; DevelopmentMegan Cowie Razvan Balaban Dave WalkerVP Student SupportEllie Munro [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Scotland&#8217;s only postgraduate club closes down by luke winter &#187; Subcity&#8217;s Back-For-One-Night-Only Research Club Party</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/news/scotlands-only-postgraduate-club-closes-down/#comment-4644</link> <dc:creator>luke winter &#187; Subcity&#8217;s Back-For-One-Night-Only Research Club Party</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:45:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=3748#comment-4644</guid> <description>[...] The Research Club closed for good in mysterious circumstances a month later. Hella glad we saw it out with the party it [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Research Club closed for good in mysterious circumstances a month later. Hella glad we saw it out with the party it [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Court to reconsider closure of Slavonic Studies by Stoppard presents petition to Scottish Parliament &#124; Glasgow Guardian</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/news/court-to-reconsider-slavonic-studies/#comment-4643</link> <dc:creator>Stoppard presents petition to Scottish Parliament &#124; Glasgow Guardian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:03:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=6297#comment-4643</guid> <description>[...] the Hive September 8, 2011 Stoppard presents petition to Scottish Parliament September 22, 2011 Court to reconsider closure of Slavonic Studies September 20, 2011 Live Free or Don&#8217;t: DIY and Glasgow September 20, 2011 Test Issuu Publish [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Hive September 8, 2011 Stoppard presents petition to Scottish Parliament September 22, 2011 Court to reconsider closure of Slavonic Studies September 20, 2011 Live Free or Don&#8217;t: DIY and Glasgow September 20, 2011 Test Issuu Publish [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Inside Story: MyCampus by Stuart Alexander Hannah</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/views/insidestory/mycampus/#comment-4639</link> <dc:creator>Stuart Alexander Hannah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=6246#comment-4639</guid> <description> The SLP is more than just a software deliverable, it has been an attempt to understand and replicate all the different processes that had been taking place in various university departments. Things such as varying enrollment times and funding organizations should have been picked up at the requirements gathering stage (which finished a couple of years ago IIRC), and it was the responsibility of the medical department to ensure that all their requirements were given. That they have obviously not been, who are we to blame? The article above states that it is all SMG&#039;s fault, I am merely speculating that it is a cumulation of errors and perhaps some members of staff have been dragging their feet. A university is a very political thing, and as I pointed out there seems to have been anger at the SNP since the beginning.Don&#039;t get me wrong, I sympathize with you. I am just a little skeptical about where the blame is being placed.&gt;And as for it having only been live for three weeks, the code was written five years ago.This is a tad naive. The peoplesoft campus solutions code has been about for a while, but customization of such software to be deployed into a very complex system takes a bit of tweaking. The sheer number of actors in this system make testing a far from trivial task (the glasgow way of completely open choice in 1st and 2nd year must be a combinatorial nightmare).As to your immediate problem,&gt;For my course and my year, we&#039;re nearly into the fourth week of term and we have rent to pay and we&#039;re skint. So, yeah, that&#039;s a bit of a motivation for genuine complaint, if I&#039;m honest.I strongly recommend you get in touch with the SRChttp://www.src.gla.ac.uk/advice/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SLP is more than just a software deliverable, it has been an<br /> attempt to understand and replicate all the different processes<br /> that had been taking place in various university<br /> departments. Things such as varying enrollment times and funding<br /> organizations should have been picked up at the requirements<br /> gathering stage (which finished a couple of years ago IIRC), and<br /> it was the responsibility of the medical department to ensure<br /> that all their requirements were given. That they have obviously<br /> not been, who are we to blame? The article above states that it<br /> is all SMG&#8217;s fault, I am merely speculating that it is a<br /> cumulation of errors and perhaps some members of staff have been<br /> dragging their feet. A university is a very political thing, and<br /> as I pointed out there seems to have been anger at the SNP since<br /> the beginning.</p><p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I sympathize with you. I am just a little<br /> skeptical about where the blame is being placed.</p><p>&gt;And as for it having only been live for three weeks, the code<br /> was written five years ago.</p><p>This is a tad naive. The peoplesoft campus solutions code has<br /> been about for a while, but customization of such software to be<br /> deployed into a very complex system takes a bit of tweaking. The<br /> sheer number of actors in this system make testing a far from<br /> trivial task (the glasgow way of completely open choice in 1st<br /> and 2nd year must be a combinatorial nightmare).</p><p>As to your immediate problem,</p><p>&gt;For my course and my year, we&#8217;re nearly into the fourth week of<br /> term and we have rent to pay and we&#8217;re skint. So, yeah, that&#8217;s a<br /> bit of a motivation for genuine complaint, if I&#8217;m honest.</p><p>I strongly recommend you get in touch with the SRC</p><p><a href="http://www.src.gla.ac.uk/advice/" rel="nofollow">http://www.src.gla.ac.uk/advice/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on &#8220;It woz the Occupation wot did it&#8221; doesn&#8217;t quite hold true by Anonymous</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/views/it-woz-the-occupation-wot-did-it/#comment-4638</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 12:50:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=6202#comment-4638</guid> <description>Exactly P.J. University will have to listen to students unless it wants a repeat of 2010-11.Of course they&#039;re fine dealing with the SRC, as it seems they have their own pet in place as President.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly P.J. University will have to listen to students unless it wants a repeat of 2010-11.</p><p>Of course they&#8217;re fine dealing with the SRC, as it seems they have their own pet in place as President.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Inside Story: MyCampus by Beth Routledge</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/views/insidestory/mycampus/#comment-4637</link> <dc:creator>Beth Routledge</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=6246#comment-4637</guid> <description>You would appreciate it if people were more open about their motivations?OK, then.First, I am not a member of staff kicking up bluster. I am a final year student, I have a number of genuine complaints, and I have at this point made my genuine complaints to several people. I am in my fifth year and in the four years previous, I never had any problems with Websurf.My initial complaint was that the order in which MyCampus became active didn&#039;t seem to take into account the fact that different people started term at different times, which meant that the rollout was completely random, which meant that medics in their clinical years weren&#039;t able to do anything about registration until five days before their academic year started. If only I had known what was to come, I&#039;d have thought that we were getting off lightly.The financial registration does not recognise my funding body as a valid funding body, which means that I have to upload a scanned document proving that they are funding me. My funding body, incidentally, is NHS England, which is not exactly what you&#039;d call unheard of. The way in which funding for medical students works means that there are a lot of us who are funded by NHS England and we&#039;ve all had this problem. There are other people whose funding bodies are not recognised as valid funding bodies, either. Those people are funded by such obscure organisations as the Northern Ireland Education and Library Boards (the equivalent of SAAS) and Her Majesty&#039;s Armed Forces. You cannot take this document in in person or post it or allow your funding body to send it in for you, all three of which were valid options under the old system. Oh, and the system still does not allow you to enrol even once you&#039;ve uploaded everything, so the whole process is pointless in the extreme. And because the system will not allow you to enrol even once you have completed all the necessary bits and bobs, you are not registered, and without being registered, most funding bodies will not release student loans and you can&#039;t apply for hardship funds. For my course and my year, we&#039;re nearly into the fourth week of term and we have rent to pay and we&#039;re skint. So, yeah, that&#039;s a bit of a motivation for genuine complaint, if I&#039;m honest.Then there&#039;s the fact that I myself have not yet received written confirmation from NHS England that they will fund me this year. They will, but I haven&#039;t got a letter from them yet, so I can&#039;t upload it. Last year, I would have had until October to provide my written confirmation of fees funding. I assumed that I would still have until October. Instead, I got a phone call on Monday from someone who said that they were calling from the university and wished to inform me that if I didn&#039;t complete financial registration by Sunday evening then I would be refused entry to this academic year and would have to drop back a year. I lost it a bit at that point. Because, not being able to graduate this year because MyCampus doesn&#039;t work? Well, that&#039;s a bit of a motivation for genuine complaint, too. That was when I hung up on the person on the phone and became the short shouty woman in the middle of the Fraser Building. I was not the only person to receive such a phone call and so far as I can gather, most of the English-domiciled final year medical students, many of whom, like me, do not have written confirmation of our funding yet, are still final year medical students only because the medical school has managed to buy us some time.And as for it having only been live for three weeks, the code was written five years ago. Yes, when something goes live there are always teething problems that were never anticipated in beta, but you&#039;d think that at some point in the last five years there might have been the opportunity to test it enough that there weren&#039;t problems on a scale that I would categorise more as DOA than as simple teething troubles.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would appreciate it if people were more open about their motivations?</p><p>OK, then.</p><p>First, I am not a member of staff kicking up bluster. I am a final year student, I have a number of genuine complaints, and I have at this point made my genuine complaints to several people. I am in my fifth year and in the four years previous, I never had any problems with Websurf.</p><p>My initial complaint was that the order in which MyCampus became active didn&#8217;t seem to take into account the fact that different people started term at different times, which meant that the rollout was completely random, which meant that medics in their clinical years weren&#8217;t able to do anything about registration until five days before their academic year started. If only I had known what was to come, I&#8217;d have thought that we were getting off lightly.</p><p>The financial registration does not recognise my funding body as a valid funding body, which means that I have to upload a scanned document proving that they are funding me. My funding body, incidentally, is NHS England, which is not exactly what you&#8217;d call unheard of. The way in which funding for medical students works means that there are a lot of us who are funded by NHS England and we&#8217;ve all had this problem. There are other people whose funding bodies are not recognised as valid funding bodies, either. Those people are funded by such obscure organisations as the Northern Ireland Education and Library Boards (the equivalent of SAAS) and Her Majesty&#8217;s Armed Forces. You cannot take this document in in person or post it or allow your funding body to send it in for you, all three of which were valid options under the old system. Oh, and the system still does not allow you to enrol even once you&#8217;ve uploaded everything, so the whole process is pointless in the extreme. And because the system will not allow you to enrol even once you have completed all the necessary bits and bobs, you are not registered, and without being registered, most funding bodies will not release student loans and you can&#8217;t apply for hardship funds. For my course and my year, we&#8217;re nearly into the fourth week of term and we have rent to pay and we&#8217;re skint. So, yeah, that&#8217;s a bit of a motivation for genuine complaint, if I&#8217;m honest.</p><p>Then there&#8217;s the fact that I myself have not yet received written confirmation from NHS England that they will fund me this year. They will, but I haven&#8217;t got a letter from them yet, so I can&#8217;t upload it. Last year, I would have had until October to provide my written confirmation of fees funding. I assumed that I would still have until October. Instead, I got a phone call on Monday from someone who said that they were calling from the university and wished to inform me that if I didn&#8217;t complete financial registration by Sunday evening then I would be refused entry to this academic year and would have to drop back a year. I lost it a bit at that point. Because, not being able to graduate this year because MyCampus doesn&#8217;t work? Well, that&#8217;s a bit of a motivation for genuine complaint, too. That was when I hung up on the person on the phone and became the short shouty woman in the middle of the Fraser Building. I was not the only person to receive such a phone call and so far as I can gather, most of the English-domiciled final year medical students, many of whom, like me, do not have written confirmation of our funding yet, are still final year medical students only because the medical school has managed to buy us some time.</p><p>And as for it having only been live for three weeks, the code was written five years ago. Yes, when something goes live there are always teething problems that were never anticipated in beta, but you&#8217;d think that at some point in the last five years there might have been the opportunity to test it enough that there weren&#8217;t problems on a scale that I would categorise more as DOA than as simple teething troubles.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Inside Story: MyCampus by Stuart Alexander Hannah</title><link>http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/views/insidestory/mycampus/#comment-4636</link> <dc:creator>Stuart Alexander Hannah</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://glasgowguardian.co.uk/?p=6246#comment-4636</guid> <description>Hmm, anonymous submission.It seems to me that a lot of the bluster that gets kicked up comes directly from staff. I&#039;m sure there are a host of genuine complaints out there, but I&#039;d appreciate if people were more open about their motivations (I&#039;m just a general cynic FYI). There has been a barrage of FOI requests  from the very start [1] and clear hostility towards the project. It make me wonder if placing the blame on SLP or SMG or whatever TLA (three-letter-acronym) of choice is quite so clear cut. A number of errors that I&#039;ve heard about seem to be departmental (or school, that is annoying I grant you) in nature, things like incorrect course credits and course (pre)requisites. Hmm...&gt;(By way of comparison, Microsoft Word enjoys its twenty-eighth birthday this year. Imagine a business model premised on using that first edition of Word from 1983 until now.)Bad comparison, plenty of software from the 80&#039;s is still around today, mostly backend stuff.&gt;I suppose that a nine-hundred strong Facebook group full of complaints will indeed attract interest, but I don’t think we’re getting the sort of reputation that SMG had in mind.[2] [3] [4]Really, do people not remember websurf?  If you have been successful in blocking it, let me know how. My copious-volume-of-gin-for-breakfast method has so far been unsuccessful.The system has been active for 3 weeks or something. Let&#039;s wait a while before we judge.[1][2][3][4]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, anonymous submission.</p><p>It seems to me that a lot of the bluster that gets kicked up comes directly from staff. I&#8217;m sure there are a host of genuine complaints out there, but I&#8217;d appreciate if people were more open about their motivations (I&#8217;m just a general cynic FYI). There has been a barrage of FOI requests  from the very start [1] and clear hostility towards the project. It make me wonder if placing the blame on SLP or SMG or whatever TLA (three-letter-acronym) of choice is quite so clear cut. A number of errors that I&#8217;ve heard about seem to be departmental (or school, that is annoying I grant you) in nature, things like incorrect course credits and course (pre)requisites. Hmm&#8230;</p><p>&gt;(By way of comparison, Microsoft Word enjoys its twenty-eighth birthday this year. Imagine a business model premised on using that first edition of Word from 1983 until now.)</p><p>Bad comparison, plenty of software from the 80&#8242;s is still around today, mostly backend stuff.</p><p>&gt;I suppose that a nine-hundred strong Facebook group full of complaints will indeed attract interest, but I don’t think we’re getting the sort of reputation that SMG had in mind.</p><p>[2] [3] [4]</p><p>Really, do people not remember websurf?  If you have been successful in blocking it, let me know how. My copious-volume-of-gin-for-breakfast method has so far been unsuccessful.</p><p>The system has been active for 3 weeks or something. Let&#8217;s wait a while before we judge.</p><p>[1]</p><p>[2]</p><p>[3]</p><p>[4]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 1/22 queries in 0.012 seconds using apc
Object Caching 350/385 objects using apc

Served from: glasgowguardian.co.uk @ 2012-05-18 03:05:13 -->
